4.8 Article

The p53 inhibitors MDM2/MDMX complex is required for control of p53 activity in vivo

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102309108

Keywords

knockin mouse model; p53 regulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871363, 81071666]
  2. New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of State Education Ministry [NCET-08-0349]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006BAI23B02]
  5. E-Institutes of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [E03003]
  6. National Institutes of Health [NCI R01 CA85679, RO1 CA125144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are currently two distinct models proposed to explain why both MDM2 and MDMX are required in p53 control, with a key difference centered on whether these two p53 inhibitors work together or independently. To test these two competing models, we generated knockin mice expressing a point mutation MDMX mutant (C462A) that is defective in MDM2 binding. This approach allowed a targeted disassociation of the MDM2/MDMX heterocomplex without affecting the ability of MDMX to bind to p53, and while leaving the MDM2 protein itself completely untouched. Significantly, Mdmx(C462A/C462A) homozygous mice died at approximately day 9.5 of embryonic development, as the result of a combination of apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation, as shown by TUNEL and BrdU incorporation assays, respectively. Interestingly, even though the MDMX mutant protein abundance was found slightly elevated in the Mdmx(C462A/C462A) homozygous embryos, both the abundance and activity of p53 were markedly increased. A p53-dependent death was demonstrated by the finding that concomitant deletion of p53 completely rescued the embryonic lethality in Mdmx(C462A/C462A) homozygous mice. Our data demonstrate that MDM2 and MDMX function as an integral complex in p53 control, providing insights into the nonredundant nature of the function of MDM2 and MDMX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available