4.8 Article

Interplay between spontaneous and induced brain activity during human non-rapid eye movement sleep

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112503108

Keywords

sleep spindles; neuroimaging; fMRI; auditory perception; sleep physiology

Funding

  1. Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
  2. Fondation Medicale Reine Elisabeth
  3. University of Liege
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme-Belgian State-Belgian Science Policy
  5. European Sleep Research Society
  6. Belgian American Educational Foundation
  7. Belgian Neurological Society
  8. Fonds Leon Fredericq
  9. Horlait- Dapsens Medical Foundation
  10. Wallonie-Bruxelles International
  11. Austrian Science Fund [J2470-B02]
  12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  13. National Institutes of Health [R01 EB009282]
  14. Fonds Leon Fredericq (Belgium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans are less responsive to the surrounding environment during sleep. However, the extent to which the human brain responds to external stimuli during sleep is uncertain. We used simultaneous EEG and functional MRI to characterize brain responses to tones during wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Sounds during wakefulness elicited responses in the thalamus and primary auditory cortex. These responses persisted in NREM sleep, except throughout spindles, during which they became less consistent. When sounds induced a K complex, activity in the auditory cortex was enhanced and responses in distant frontal areas were elicited, similar to the stereotypical pattern associated with slow oscillations. These data show that sound processing during NREM sleep is constrained by fundamental brain oscillatory modes (slow oscillations and spindles), which result in a complex interplay between spontaneous and induced brain activity. The distortion of sensory information at the thalamic level, especially during spindles, functionally isolates the cortex from the environment and might provide unique conditions favorable for off-line memory processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available