4.8 Article

Prediction of a hexagonal SiO2 phase affecting stabilities of MgSiO3 and CaSiO3 at multimegabar pressures

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013594108

Keywords

ab initio density functional simulation; multimegabar crystalline phase; silicon dioxide; super-Earth mantle

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20001005, 21740379]
  2. Ehime University Global Centers of Excellence
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20001005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrahigh-pressure phase relationship of SiO2 silica in multimegabar pressure condition is still quite unclear. Here, we report a theoretical prediction on a previously uncharacterized stable structure of silica with an unexpected hexagonal Fe2P-type form. This phase, more stable than the cotunnite- type structure, a previously postulated postpyrite phase, was discovered to stabilize at 640 GPa through a careful structure search by means of ab initio density functional computations over various structure models. This is the first evidential result of the pressure- induced phase transition to the Fe2P-type structure among all dioxide compounds. The crystal structure consists of closely packed, fairly regular SiO9 tricapped trigonal prisms with a significantly compact lattice. Additional investigation further elucidates large effects of this phase change in SiO2 on the stability of MgSiO3 and CaSiO3 at multimegabar pressures. A postperovskite phase of MgSiO3 breaks down at 1.04 TPa along an assumed adiabat of super- Earths and yields Fe2P-type SiO2 and CsCl(B-2)-type MgO. CaSiO3 perovskite, on the other hand, directly dissociates into SiO2 and metallic CaO, skipping a postperovskite polymorph. Predicted ultrahigh- pressure and temperature phase diagrams of SiO2, MgSiO3, and CaSiO3 indicate that the Fe2P-type SiO2 could be one of the dominant components in the deep mantles of terrestrial exoplanets and the cores of gas giants. _ 1

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available