4.8 Article

Low absorption losses of strongly coupled surface plasmons in nanoparticle assemblies

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113563108

Keywords

nanoparticle self-assembly; photothermal heterodyne imaging; surface plasmon resonance; single particle spectroscopy; dark-field imaging

Funding

  1. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1664, C-1703]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-0955286, DMR-0547399, DMR-1105878]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-10-1-0989]
  4. 3M
  5. Richard E. Smalley Institute
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [0955286] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coupled surface plasmons in one-dimensional assemblies of metal nanoparticles have attracted significant attention because strong interparticle interactions lead to large electromagnetic field enhancements that can be exploited for localizing and amplifying electromagnetic radiation in nanoscale structures. Ohmic loss (i.e., absorption by the metal), however, limits the performance of any application due to nonradiative surface plasmon relaxation. While absorption losses have been studied theoretically, they have not been quantified experimentally for strongly coupled surface plasmons. Here, we report on the ohmic loss in one-dimensional assemblies of gold nanoparticles with small interparticle separations of only a few nanometers and hence strong plasmon coupling. Both the absorption and scattering cross-sections of coupled surface plasmons were determined and compared to electrodynamic simulations. A lower absorption and higher scattering cross-section for coupled surface plasmons compared to surface plasmons of isolated nanoparticles suggest that coupled surface plasmons suffer smaller ohmic losses and therefore act as better antennas. These experimental results provide important insight for the design of plasmonic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available