4.8 Article

A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, South Africa

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913047107

Keywords

cultural modernity; Middle Stone Age; anatomically modern humans; symbolic expression

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  2. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Sous-Direction de l'Archeologie
  3. Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur region
  4. Aquitaine region, Paleo-Anthropology Scientific Trust
  5. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  6. University of Cape Town (Department of Archaeology)
  7. Prix Clio
  8. U. S. National Science Foundation
  9. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  10. National Research Foundation
  11. Fyssen Foundation
  12. Alexander von Humbolt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ongoing debates about the emergence of modern human behavior, however defined, regularly incorporate observations from the later part of the southern African Middle Stone Age and emphasize the early appearance of artifacts thought to reflect symbolic practice. Here we report a large sample of 270 fragments of intentionally marked ostrich eggshell from the Howiesons Poort at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, Western Cape, South Africa. Dating from approximate to 60,000 years ago, these pieces attest to an engraving tradition that is the earliest reliable evidence of what is a widespread modern practice. These abstract linear depictions were made on functional items (eggshell containers), which were curated and involved in daily hunter-gatherer life. The standardized production of repetitive patterns, including a hatched band motif, suggests a system of symbolic representation in which collective identities and individual expressions are clearly communicated, suggesting social, cultural, and cognitive underpinnings that overlap with those of modern people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available