4.8 Article

Trading carbon for food: Global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011078107

Keywords

cropland expansion; deforestation; greenhouse gases; ecosystem services; land use change

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  2. Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. Nature Conservancy
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [822700] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expanding croplands to meet the needs of a growing population, changing diets, and biofuel production comes at the cost of reduced carbon stocks in natural vegetation and soils. Here, we present a spatially explicit global analysis of tradeoffs between carbon stocks and current crop yields. The difference among regions is striking. For example, for each unit of land cleared, the tropics lose nearly two times as much carbon (similar to 120 tons.ha(-1) vs. similar to 63 tons.ha(-1)) and produce less than one-half the annual crop yield compared with temperate regions (1.71 tons.ha(-1).y(-1) vs. 3.84 tons.ha(-1).y(-1)). Therefore, newly cleared land in the tropics releases nearly 3 tons of carbon for every 1 ton of annual crop yield compared with a similar area cleared in the temperate zone. By factoring crop yield into the analysis, we specify the tradeoff between carbon stocks and crops for all areas where crops are currently grown and thereby, substantially enhance the spatial resolution relative to previous regional estimates. Particularly in the tropics, emphasis should be placed on increasing yields on existing croplands rather than clearing new lands. Our high-resolution approach can be used to determine the net effect of local land use decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available