4.8 Article

Topological basis for the robust distribution of blood to rodent neocortex

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007239107

Keywords

anastomoses; imaging; networks; stroke; vasculature

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB003832, MH085499, NS059832]
  2. Israeli Science Foundation
  3. American Heart Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The maintenance of robust blood flow to the brain is crucial to the health of brain tissue. We examined the pial network of the middle cerebral artery, which distributes blood from the cerebral arteries to the penetrating arterioles that source neocortical microvasculature, to characterize how vascular topology may support such robustness. For both mice and rats, two features dominate the topology. First, interconnected loops span the entire territory sourced by the middle cerebral artery. Although the loops comprise < 10% of all branches, they maintain the overall connectivity of the network after multiple breaks. Second, > 80% of offshoots from the loops are stubs that end in a single penetrating arteriole, as opposed to trees with multiple penetrating arterioles. We hypothesize that the loops and stubs protect blood flow to the parenchyma from an occlusion in a surface vessel. To test this, we assayed the viability of tissue that was sourced by an individual penetrating arteriole following occlusion of a proximal branch in the surface loop. We observed that neurons remained healthy, even when occlusion led to a reduction in the local blood flow. In contrast, direct blockage of a single penetrating arteriole invariably led to neuronal death and formation of a cyst. Our results show that the surface vasculature functions as a grid for the robust allocation of blood in the event of vascular dysfunction. The combined results of the present and prior studies imply that the pial network reallocates blood in response to changing metabolic needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available