4.6 Article

Application of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in large invasive pituitary adenoma surgery

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 168-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.001

Keywords

intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging; invasion; microsurgery; pituitary adenoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Jinling Hospital of Nanjing, School of Medicine, Nanjing University [2010M023]
  2. Major Innovative Project of Medical Science and Technology of Nanjing Military Command [14ZX16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the clinical application value of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in large invasive pituitary adenoma surgery. Methods: A total of 30 patients with large pituitary adenoma underwent microscopic tumor resection under the assistance of an iMRI system; 26 cases received surgery through the nasal-transsphenoidal approach, and the remaining four cases received surgery through the pterion approach. iMRI was performed one or two times depending on the need of the surgeon. If a residual tumor was found, further resection was conducted under iMRI guidance. Results: iMRI revealed residual tumors in 12 cases, among which nine cases received further resection. Of these nine cases, iMRI rescanning confirmed complete resection in six cases, and subtotal resection in the remaining three. Overall, 24 cases of tumor were totally resected, and six cases were subtotally resected. The total resection rate of tumors increased from 60% to 80%. Conclusion: iMRI can effectively determine the resection extent of pituitary adenomas. In addition, it provides an objective basis for real-time judgment of surgical outcome, subsequently improving surgical accuracy and safety, and increasing the total tumor resection rate. Copyright (C) 2015, Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available