4.8 Article

Biological markers of the effects of intravenous methylphenidate on improving inhibitory control in cocaine-dependent patients

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002467107

Keywords

functional MRI; psychostimulant; catecholamine; cognitive control; ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R03DA022395, K12DA000167, K02DA026990, K24DA017899]
  2. National Center for Research Resources and National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research [UL1 RR024139]
  3. State of Connecticut

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prior research points to the importance of psychostimulants in improving self-control. However, the neural substrates underlying such improvement remain unclear. Here, in a pharmacological functional MRI study of the stop signal task, we show that methylphenidate (as compared with placebo) robustly decreased stop signal reaction time (SSRT), an index of improved control, in cocaine-dependent patients (a population in which inhibitory control is impaired). Methylphenidate-induced decreases in SSRT were positively correlated with inhibition-related activation of left middle frontal cortex (MFC) and negatively with activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in whole brain linear regressions. Inhibition-related MFC but not vmPFC activation distinguished individuals with short and long SSRT in 36 demographically matched healthy individuals, whereas vmPFC but not MFC activation, along with improvement in SSRT, was correlated with a previously implicated biomarker of methylphenidate response (systolic blood pressure). These results implicate a specific neural (i.e., vmPFC) mechanism whereby stimulants improve inhibitory control. Altered ventromedial prefrontal activation and increased blood pressure may represent useful CNS and peripheral biomarkers in individualized treatment with methylphenidate for patients with cocaine dependence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available