4.8 Article

Chronology of the Grotte du Renne (France) and implications for the context of ornaments and human remains within the Chatelperronian

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007963107

Keywords

Aurignacian; radiocarbon dating; ultrafiltration; Neandertal; Mousterian

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H004491/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H004491/1, NE/D014077/1, NRCF010002] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/H004491/1, NRCF010002, NE/D014077/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is extensive debate concerning the cognitive and behavioral adaptation of Neanderthals, especially in the period when the earliest anatomically modern humans dispersed into Western Europe, around 35,000-40,000 B. P. The site of the Grotte du Renne (at Arcy-sur-Cure) is of great importance because it provides the most persuasive evidence for behavioral complexity among Neanderthals. A range of ornaments and tools usually associated with modern human industries, such as the Aurignacian, were excavated from three of the Chatelperronian levels at the site, along with Neanderthal fossil remains (mainly teeth). This extremely rare occurrence has been taken to suggest that Neanderthals were the creators of these items. Whether Neanderthals independently achieved this level of behavioral complexity and whether this was culturally transmitted or mimicked via incoming modern humans has been contentious. At the heart of this discussion lies an assumption regarding the integrity of the excavated remains. One means of testing this is by radiocarbon dating; however, until recently, our ability to generate both accurate and precise results for this period has been compromised. A series of 31 accelerator mass spectrometry ultrafiltered dates on bones, antlers, artifacts, and teeth from six key archaeological levels shows an unexpected degree of variation. This suggests that some mixing of material may have occurred, which implies a more complex depositional history at the site and makes it difficult to be confident about the association of artifacts with human remains in the Ch telperronian levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available