4.8 Article

Hydrophobic nanoparticles improve permeability of cell-encapsulating poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels while maintaining patternability

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005211107

Keywords

tissue engineering; cell encapsulation; hydrogel network properties; hepatitis C virus

Funding

  1. Mogam Scientific Scholarship
  2. American Liver Foundation
  3. Stanford Dean's Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Beckman Interdisciplinary Translational Research
  5. Burroughs Welcome Fund Clinical Scientist Award in Translational Research
  6. Center for Translational Research in Chronic Viral Infections
  7. Center on Polymer Interfaces and Macromolecular Assemblies
  8. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell encapsulating poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels represent a promising approach for constructing 3D cultures designed to more closely approximate in vivo tissue environment. Improved strategies are needed, however, to optimally balance hydrogel permeability to support metabolic activities of encapsulated cells, while maintaining patternability to restore key aspects of tissue architecture. Herein, we have developed one such strategy incorporating hydrophobic nanoparticles to partially induce looser cross-linking density at the particle-hydrogel interface. Strikingly, our network design significantly increased hydrogel permeability, while only minimally affecting the matrix mechanical strength or prepolymer viscosity. This structural advantage improved viability and functions of encapsulated cells and permitted micron-scale structures to control over spatial distribution of incorporated cells. We expect that this design strategy holds promise for the development of more advanced artificial tissues that can promote high levels of cell metabolic activity and recapitulate key architectural features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available