4.8 Article

Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910967107

Keywords

education; mathematics; gender; stereotype; modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-0751336, CAREER DRL-0746970]
  2. Division Of Research On Learning
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources [746970] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People's fear and anxiety about doing math-over and above actual math ability-can be an impediment to their math achievement. We show that when the math-anxious individuals are female elementary school teachers, their math anxiety carries negative consequences for the math achievement of their female students. Early elementary school teachers in the United States are almost exclusively female (> 90%), and we provide evidence that these female teachers' anxieties relate to girls' math achievement via girls' beliefs about who is good at math. First- and second-grade female teachers completed measures of math anxiety. The math achievement of the students in these teachers' classrooms was also assessed. There was no relation between a teacher's math anxiety and her students' math achievement at the beginning of the school year. By the school year's end, however, the more anxious teachers were about math, the more likely girls ( but not boys) were to endorse the commonly held stereotype that boys are good at math, and girls are good at reading and the lower these girls' math achievement. Indeed, by the end of the school year, girls who endorsed this stereotype had significantly worse math achievement than girls who did not and than boys overall. In early elementary school, where the teachers are almost all female, teachers' math anxiety carries consequences for girls' math achievement by influencing girls' beliefs about who is good at math.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available