4.8 Article

Mapping of multiple susceptibility variants within the MHC region for 7 immune-mediated diseases

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909307106

Keywords

autoimmunity; genes; genetics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI067152]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK064869, DK062432]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke [NS21799]
  4. Swedish National Research Counci
  5. Medical Research Council [G0000934]
  6. Wellcome Trust [068545/Z/02]
  7. National Center for Research Resources [U54 RR020278]
  8. MRC [G0000934] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0000934] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10335] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human MHC represents the strongest susceptibility locus for autoimmune diseases. However, the identification of the true predisposing gene(s) has been handicapped by the strong linkage disequilibrium across the region. Furthermore, most studies to date have been limited to the examination of a subset of the HLA and non-HLA genes with a marker density and sample size insufficient for mapping all independent association signals. We genotyped a panel of 1,472 SNPs to capture the common genomic variation across the 3.44 megabase (Mb) classic MHC region in 10,576 DNA samples derived from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, myasthenia gravis, selective IgA deficiency, multiple sclerosis, and appropriate control samples. We identified the primary association signals for each disease and performed conditional regression to identify independent secondary signals. The data demonstrate that MHC associations with autoimmune diseases result from complex, multilocus effects that span the entire region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available