4.8 Article

Complexity in bacterial cell-cell communication: Quorum signal integration and subpopulation signaling in the Bacillus subtilis phosphorelay

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810878106

Keywords

heterogeneity; Phr; quorum sensing; sporulation; model

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM073010-01]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BI1213-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A common form of quorum sensing in Gram-positive bacteria is mediated by peptides that act as phosphatase regulators (Phr) of receptor aspartyl phosphatases (Raps). In Bacillus subtilis, several Phr signals are integrated in sporulation phosphorelay signal transduction. We theoretically demonstrate that the phosphorelay can act as a computational machine performing a sensitive division operation of kinase-encoded signals by quorum-modulated Rap signals, indicative of cells computing a food per cell'' estimate to decide whether to enter sporulation. We predict expression from the rapA-phrA operon to bifurcate as relative environmental signals change in a developing population. We experimentally observe that the rapA-phrA operon is heterogeneously induced in sporulating microcolonies. Uninduced cells sporulate rather synchronously early on, whereas the RapA/PhrA subpopulation sporulates less synchronously throughout later stationary phase. Moreover, we show that cells sustain PhrA expression during periods of active growth. Together with the model, these findings suggest that the phosphorelay may normalize environmental signals by the size of the (sub) population actively competing for nutrients (as signaled by PhrA). Generalizing this concept, the various Phrs could facilitate subpopulation communication in dense isogenic communities to control the physiological strategies followed by differentiated subpopulations by interpreting (environmental) signals based on the spatiotemporal community structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available