4.8 Article

Association of FOXO3A variation with human longevity confirmed in German centenarians

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809594106

Keywords

aging; forkhead box O3A; genetic association study; long-lived individuals

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Excellence Cluster Inflammation at Interfaces
  2. German Federal Ministry of Science and Education
  3. French Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  4. Genetics of Healthy Aging Consortium
  5. 6. Framework Program of the European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human forkhead box O3A gene (FOXO3A) encodes an evolutionarily conserved key regulator of the insulin-IGF1 signaling pathway that is known to influence metabolism and lifespan in model organisms. A recent study described 3 SNPs in the FOXO3A gene that were statistically significantly associated with longevity in a discovery sample of long-lived men of Japanese ancestry [Willcox et al. (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13987-13992]. However, this finding required replication in an independent population. Here, we have investigated 16 known FOXO3A SNPs in an extensive collection of 1,762 German centenarians/nonagenarians and younger controls and provide evidence that polymorphisms in this gene were indeed associated with the ability to attain exceptional old age. The FOXO3A association was considerably stronger in centenarians than in nonagenarians, highlighting the importance of centenarians for genetic longevity research. Our study extended the initial finding observed in Japanese men to women and indicates that both genders were likely to be equally affected by variation in FOXO3A. Replication in a French centenarian sample generated a trend that supported the previous results. Our findings confirmed the initial discovery in the Japanese sample and indicate FOXO3A as a susceptibility gene for prolonged survival in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available