4.8 Article

Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909892106

Keywords

combinatorial geometry; phase transitions; linear programming; iterative thresholding algorithms; state evolution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER [CCF-0743978]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMS-0806211, DMS-050530]
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [743978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compressed sensing aims to undersample certain high-dimensional signals yet accurately reconstruct them by exploiting signal characteristics. Accurate reconstruction is possible when the object to be recovered is sufficiently sparse in a known basis. Currently, the best known sparsity-undersampling tradeoff is achieved when reconstructing by convex optimization, which is expensive in important large-scale applications. Fast iterative thresholding algorithms have been intensively studied as alternatives to convex optimization for large-scale problems. Unfortunately known fast algorithms offer substantially worse sparsity-undersampling tradeoffs than convex optimization. We introduce a simple costless modification to iterative thresholding making the sparsity-undersampling tradeoff of the new algorithms equivalent to that of the corresponding convex optimization procedures. The new iterative-thresholding algorithms are inspired by belief propagation in graphical models. Our empirical measurements of the sparsity-undersampling tradeoff for the new algorithms agree with theoretical calculations. We show that a state evolution formalism correctly derives the true sparsity-undersampling tradeoff. There is a surprising agreement between earlier calculations based on random convex polytopes and this apparently very different theoretical formalism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available