4.8 Article

Distribution history and climatic controls of the Late Miocene Pikermian chronofauna

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902598106

Keywords

fossil mammals; paleoclimate; Pikermi; similarity index

Funding

  1. The Academy of Finland
  2. Helsingin Sanomain 100-vuotissaatioand Kone Foundation
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  4. federal state Hessen (Germany)
  5. National Science Foundation [0125009, BCS-0321893]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [0125009] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Late Miocene development of faunas and environments in western Eurasia is well known, but the climatic and environmental processes that controlled its details are incompletely understood. Here we map the rise and fall of the classic Pikermian fossil mammal chronofauna between 12 and 4.2 Ma, using genus-level faunal similarity between localities. To directly relate land mammal community evolution to environmental change, we use the hypsodonty paleoprecipitation proxy and paleoclimate modeling. The geographic distribution of faunal similarity and paleoprecipitation in successive timeslices shows the development of the open biome that favored the evolution and spread of the open-habitat adapted large mammal lineages. In the climate model run, this corresponds to a decrease in precipitation over its core area south of the Paratethys Sea. The process began in the latest Middle Miocene and climaxed in the medial Late Miocene, about 7-8 million years ago. The geographic range of the Pikermian chronofauna contracted in the latest Miocene, a time of increasing summer drought and regional differentiation of habitats in Eastern Europe and Southwestern Asia. Its demise at the Miocene-Pliocene boundary coincides with an environmental reversal toward increased humidity and forestation, changes inevitably detrimental to open-adapted, wide-ranging large mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available