4.8 Article

Chimeric transcript discovery by paired-end transcriptome sequencing

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904720106

Keywords

bioinformatics; gene fusions; prostate cancer; breast cancer; RNA-Seq

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P50CA69568, R01 CA132874, P50 CA069568, K99 CA129565, 1K99CA129565-01A1, R01CA132874, U01 CA111275, K99 CA129565-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [U54 DA021519] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recurrent gene fusions are a prevalent class of mutations arising from the juxtaposition of 2 distinct regions, which can generate novel functional transcripts that could serve as valuable therapeutic targets in cancer. Therefore, we aim to establish a sensitive, high-throughput methodology to comprehensively catalog functional gene fusions in cancer by evaluating a paired-end transcriptome sequencing strategy. Not only did a paired-end approach provide a greater dynamic range in comparison with single read based approaches, but it clearly distinguished the high-level driving'' gene fusions, such as BCR-ABL1 and TMPRSS2-ERG, from potential lower level passenger'' gene fusions. Also, the comprehensiveness of a paired-end approach enabled the discovery of 12 previously undescribed gene fusions in 4 commonly used cell lines that eluded previous approaches. Using the paired-end transcriptome sequencing approach, we observed readthrough mRNA chimeras, tissue-type restricted chimeras, converging transcripts, diverging transcripts, and overlapping mRNA transcripts. Last, we successfully used paired-end transcriptome sequencing to detect previously undescribed ETS gene fusions in prostate tumors. Together, this study establishes a highly specific and sensitive approach for accurately and comprehensively cataloguing chimeras within a sample using paired-end transcriptome sequencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available