4.8 Article

Nanoparticles reveal that human cervicovaginal mucus is riddled with pores larger than viruses

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911748107

Keywords

cervicovaginal tract; herpes simplex virus; hydrophobic interactions; microstructure; particle tracking

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5U01AI066726, R21HL089816, R01EB00355]
  2. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms by which mucus helps prevent viruses from infecting mucosal surfaces are not well understood. We engineered non-mucoadhesive nanoparticles of various sizes and used them as probes to determine the spacing between mucin fibers (pore sizes) in fresh undiluted human cervicovaginal mucus (CVM) obtained from volunteers with healthy vaginal microflora. We found that most pores in CVM have diameters significantly larger than human viruses (average pore size 340 +/- 70 nm; range approximately 50-1800 nm). This mesh structure is substantially more open than the 15-100-nm spacing expected assuming mucus consists primarily of a random array of individual mucin fibers. Addition of a nonionic detergent to CVM caused the average pore size to decrease to 130 +/- 50 nm. This suggests hydrophobic interactions between lipid-coated naked protein regions on mucins normally cause mucin fibers to self-condense and/or bundle with other fibers, creating mucin cables at least three times thicker than individual mucin fibers. Although the native mesh structure is not tight enough to trap most viruses, we found that herpes simplex virus (approximately 180 nm) was strongly trapped in CVM, moving at least 8,000-fold slower than non-mucoadhesive 200-nm nanoparticles. This work provides an accurate measurement of the pore structure of fresh, hydrated ex vivo CVM and demonstrates that mucoadhesion, rather than steric obstruction, may be a critical protective mechanism against a major sexually transmitted virus and perhaps other viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available