4.8 Article

A central role for venom in predation by Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) and the extinct giant Varanus (Megalania) priscus

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810883106

Keywords

evolution; phylogeny; squamate; protein; toxin

Funding

  1. Australian Academy of Science
  2. Australian French Association for Science and Technology
  3. Australia and Pacific Science Foundation
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0665971, DP0772814]
  5. CASS Foundation
  6. Ian Potter Foundation
  7. International Human Frontiers Science Program Organisation
  8. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  9. University of Melbourne
  10. Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development Victoria Fellowship
  11. Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training International Science Linkages
  12. Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute
  13. University of New South Wales
  14. Australian Research Council [DP0665971, DP0772814] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The predatory ecology of Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) has been a subject of long-standing interest and considerable conjecture. Here, we investigate the roles and potential interplay between cranial mechanics, toxic bacteria, and venom. Our analyses point to the presence of a sophisticated combined-arsenal killing apparatus. We find that the lightweight skull is relatively poorly adapted to generate high bite forces but better adapted to resist high pulling loads. We reject the popular notion regarding toxic bacteria utilization. Instead, we demonstrate that the effects of deep wounds inflicted are potentiated through venom with toxic activities including anticoagulation and shock induction. Anatomical comparisons of V. komodoensis with V. (Megalania) priscus fossils suggest that the closely related extinct giant was the largest venomous animal to have ever lived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available