4.8 Article

A transcriptomic analysis of superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parents

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902340106

Keywords

heterosis; hybrid rice; transcriptome; quantitative trait loci; differentially expressed genes

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-SW-306, KSCX1-SW-03, KSCX1-SW-03-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90208001, 30550005, 30221004]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2004CB720406, 2006CB101706]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology [2002AA229021, 2006AA10A101]
  5. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20060533064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using a whole-genome oligonucleotide microarray, designed based on known and predicted indica rice genes, we investigated transcriptome profiles in developing leaves and panicles of superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parental cultivars 93-11 and PA64s. We detected 22,266 expressed genes out of 36,926 total genes set collectively from 7 tissues, including leaves at seedling and tillering stages, flag leaves at booting, heading, flowering, and filling stages, and panicles at filling stage. Clustering results showed that the F1 hybrid's expression profiles resembled those of its parental lines more than that which lies between the 2 parental lines. Out of the total gene set, 7,078 genes are shared by all sampled tissues and 3,926 genes (10.6% of the total gene set) are differentially expressed genes (DG). As we divided DG into those between the parents (DG(PP)) and between the hybrid and its parents (DG(HP)), the comparative results showed that genes in the categories of energy metabolism and transport are enriched in DG(HP) rather than in DG(PP). In addition, we correlated the concurrence of DG and yield-related quantitative trait loci, providing a potential group of heterosis-related genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available