4.8 Article

Impacts of tropical cyclones on US forest tree mortality and carbon flux from 1851 to 2000

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808914106

Keywords

carbon balance; forest biomass; hurricanes; spatial-temporal dynamics; wind field

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science through the Coastal Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research at Tulane University
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  3. United States Geological Survey
  4. Tulane University's Research Enhancement Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical cyclones cause extensive tree mortality and damage to forested ecosystems. A number of patterns in tropical cyclone frequency and intensity have been identified. There exist, however, few studies on the dynamic impacts of historical tropical cyclones at a continental scale. Here, we synthesized field measurements, satellite image analyses, and empirical models to evaluate forest and carbon cycle impacts for historical tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2000 over the continental U.S. Results demonstrated an average of 97 million trees affected each year over the entire United States, with a 53-Tg annual biomass loss, and an average carbon release of 25 Tg y(-1). Over the period 1980-1990, released CO2 potentially offset the carbon sink in forest trees by 9-18% over the entire United States. U.S. forests also experienced twice the impact before 1900 than after 1900 because of more active tropical cyclones and a larger extent of forested areas. Forest impacts were primarily located in Gulf Coast areas, particularly southern Texas and Louisiana and south Florida, while significant impacts also occurred in eastern North Carolina. Results serve as an important baseline for evaluating how potential future changes in hurricane frequency and intensity will impact forest tree mortality and carbon balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available