4.8 Article

Restriction versus guidance in protein structure prediction

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907002106

Keywords

fragment assembly; associative memory Hamiltonian; protein folding; annealing; molecular dynamics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY-0822283, NSF-Career CHE0349303,, NSF-CCF-0523908, NSF-CDI CHE-0835824]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM44557]
  3. Welch Foundation [C-1570]
  4. NSF [CNS-0421109, CNS-0454333, EIA0216467]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [0835824] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0821727] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conformational restriction by fragment assembly and guidance in molecular dynamics are alternate conformational search strategies in protein structure prediction. We examine both approaches using a version of the associative memory Hamiltonian that incorporates the influence of water-mediated interactions (AMW). For short proteins (<70 residues), fragment assembly, while searching a restricted space, compares well to molecular dynamics and is often sufficient to fold such proteins to near-native conformations (4 angstrom) via simulated annealing. Longer proteins encounter kinetic sampling limitations in fragment assembly not seen in molecular dynamics which generally samples more native-like conformations. We also present a fragment enriched version of the standard AMW energy function, AMW-FME, which incorporates the local sequence alignment derived fragment libraries from fragment assembly directly into the energy function. This energy function, in which fragment information acts as a guide not a restriction, is found by molecular dynamics to improve on both previous approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available