4.8 Article

Maintenance of the plasma cell pool is independent of memory B cells

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800555105

Keywords

CD20; antibody-forming cell; serum antibody; B cell depletion

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI43603, R56 AI043603, R01 AI043603] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR044077, AR44077] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humoral memory to an antigen (Ag) is maintained for several decades in the form of memory B cells and serum Ab. in fact, plasma cells (PCs) that secrete Ab are known to be long-lived and could be solely responsible for maintaining the long-lived Ab titers. Alternatively, it has been proposed that the PC compartment is maintained for long periods by the differentiation of memory cells into long-lived PCs as a result of nonspecific stimulation. This model predicts accelerated decay of PC numbers in the absence of memory cells for the same Ag. To address this prediction, we have developed a mouse model system that combined the ability to deplete B cells with the ability to detect Ag-specific memory and PCs. After establishing an immune response, we depleted Ag-specific memory B cells with an anti-hCD20 mAb and determined the effect on the PC compartment over 16 weeks. Using a combination of surface markers, we demonstrated that memory B cells remained depleted over the course of the experiment. However, despite this absence of memory cells for an extended duration, PC numbers in spleen and bone marrow did not decline, which indicates that the PC compartment does not require a significant contribution from memory B cells for its maintenance and instead that PCs are sufficiently long-lived to maintain Ab titers over a long period without renewal. This observation settles an important controversy in B cell biology and has implications for the design of vaccines and for B cell depletion therapy in patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available