4.8 Article

Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710603105

Keywords

Anelosimus; cooperation; group foraging; sociality; allometry

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation
  2. Canadian National Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  3. University of Arizona
  4. Center for Insect ScienceDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A decrease in the surface area per unit volume is a well known constraint setting limits to the size of organisms at both the cellular and whole-organismal levels. Similar constraints may apply to social groups as they grow in size. The communal three-dimensional webs that social spiders build function ecologically as single units that intercept prey through their surface and should thus be subject to this constraint. Accordingly, we show that web prey capture area per spider, and thus number of insects captured per capita, decreases with colony size in a neotropical social spider. Prey biomass intake per capita, however, peaks at intermediate colony sizes because the spiders forage cooperatively and larger colonies capture increasingly large insects. A peaked prey biomass intake function would explain not only why these spiders live in groups and cooperate but also why they disperse only at large colony sizes, thus addressing both sociality and colony size range in this social spider. These findings may also explain the conspicuous absence of social spiders from higher latitudes and higher elevations, areas that we have previously shown to harbor considerably fewer insects of the largest size classes than the lowland tropical rainforests where social spiders thrive. our findings thus illustrate the relevance of scaling laws to the size and functioning of levels of organization above the individual.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available