4.8 Article

Oxygen-regulated isoforms of cytochrome c oxidase have differential effects on its nitric oxide production and on hypoxic signaling

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0709461105

Keywords

hypoxia; mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; nitrite yeast

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 30228, R01 GM030228] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, it has been reported that mitochondria possess a novel pathway for nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. This pathway is induced when cells experience hypoxia, is nitrite (NO2-)-dependent, is independent of NO synthases, and is catalyzed by cytochrome c oxidase (Cco). It has been proposed that this mitochondrially produced NO is a component of hypoxic signaling and the induction of nuclear hypoxic genes' In this study, we examine the NO2--dependent NO production in yeast engineered to contain alternative isoforms, Va or Vb, of Cco subunit V. Previous studies have shown that these isoforms have differential effects on oxygen reduction by Cco, and that their genes (COX5a and COX5b, respectively) are inversely regulated by oxygen. Here, we find that the Vb isozyme has a higher turnover rate for NO production than the Va isozyme and that the Vb isozyme produces NO at much higher oxygen concentrations than the Va isozyme. We have also found that the hypoxic genes CYC7 and OLE1 are induced to higher levels in a strain carrying the Vb isozyme than in a strain carrying the Va isozyme. Together, these results demonstrate that the subunit V isoforms have differential effects on NO2--dependent NO production by Cco and provide further support for a role of Cco in hypoxic signaling. These findings also suggest a positive feedback mechanism in which mitochondrially produced NO induces expression of COX5b, whose protein product then functions to enhance the ability of Cco to produce NO in hypoxic/anoxic cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available