4.8 Article

Imaging the impact on cuprate superconductivity of varying the interatomic distances within individual crystal unit cells

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706795105

Keywords

apical oxygen; dopant atoms; out-of-plane influence; superconducting energy gap; supermodulation

Funding

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [844115] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Materials Research [844115] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many theoretical models of high-temperature superconductivity focus only on the doping dependence of the CuO2-plane electronic structure. However, such models are manifestly insufficient to explain the strong variations in superconducting critical temperature, T-c, among cuprates that have identical hole density but are crystallographically different outside of the CuO2 plane. A key challenge, therefore, has been to identify a predominant out-of-plane influence controlling the superconductivity, with much attention focusing on the distance d(A) between the apical oxygen and the planar copper atom. Here we report direct determination of how variations in interatomic distances within individual crystalline unit cells affect the superconducting energy-gap maximum Delta of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+delta. In this material, quasiperiodic variations of unit cell geometry occur in the form of a bulk crystalline supermodulation. Within each supermodulation period, we find approximate to 9 +/- 1% cosinusoidal variation in local Delta that is anticorrelated with the associated d(A) variations. Furthermore, we show that phenomenological consistency would exist between these effects and the random Delta variations found near dopant atoms if the primary effect of the interstitial dopant atom is to displace the apical oxygen so as to diminish d(A) or tilt the CuO5 pyramid. Thus, we reveal a strong, nonrandom out-of-plane effect on cuprate superconductivity at atomic scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available