4.8 Article

Dynamic NMR effects in breast cancer dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804224105

Keywords

water exchange; screening; shutter speed

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS-40801, EB-00422, CA-120861]
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation
  3. Stony Brook University-Brookhaven National Laboratory Seed
  4. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Byrne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The passage of a vascular-injected paramagnetic contrast reagent (CR) bolus through a region-of-interest affects tissue (H2O)-H-1 relaxation and thus MR image intensity. For longitudinal relaxation [R-1 equivalent to (T-1)(-1)], the CR must have transient molecular interactions with water. Because the CR and water molecules are never uniformly distributed in the histological-scale tissue compartments, the kinetics of equilibrium water compartmental interchange are competitive. In particular, the condition of the equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange NMR system sorties through different domains as the interstitial CR concentration, [CRo], waxes and wanes. Before CR, the system is in the fast-exchange-limit (FXL). Very soon after CRo arrival, it enters the fast-exchange-regime (FXR). Near maximal [CRo], the system could enter even the slow-exchange-regime (SXR). These conditions are defined herein, and a comprehensive description of how they affect quantitative pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. Data are analyzed from a population of 22 patients initially screened suspicious for breast cancer. After participating in our study, the subjects underwent biopsy/pathology procedures and only 7 (32%) were found to have malignancies. The transient departure from FXL to FXR (and apparently not SXR) is significant in only the malignant tumors, presumably because of angiogenic capillary leakiness. Thus, if accepted, this analysis would have prevented the 68% of the biopsies that proved benign.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available