4.8 Article

Herbivore species richness and feeding complementarity affect community structure and function on a coral reef

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801946105

Keywords

biodiversity; ecosystem function; functional diversity; overfishing; seaweed-herbivore-coral interactions

Funding

  1. UNCW-NURC [SEGM-2003-19A]
  2. National Science Foundation IGERT [DGE 0114400]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship
  4. Teasley Endowment to Georgia Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumer effects on prey are well known for cascading through food webs and producing dramatic top-down effects on community structure and ecosystem function. Bottom-up effects of prey (primary producer) biodiversity are also well known. However, the role of consumer diversity in affecting community structure or ecosystem function is not well understood. Here, we show that herbivore species richness can be critical for maintaining the structure and function of coral reefs. In two experiments over 2 years, we constructed large cages enclosing single herbivore species, equal densities of mixed species of herbivores, or excluding herbivores and assessed effects on both seaweeds and corals. When compared with sing le-herbivore treatments, mixed-herbivore treatments lowered macroalgal abundance by 54-76%, enhanced cover of crustose coralline algae (preferred recruitment sites for corals) by 52-64%, increased coral cover by 22%, and prevented coral mortality. Complementary feeding by herbivorous fishes drove the herbivore richness effects, because macroalgae were unable to effectively deter fishes with different feeding strategies. Maintaining herbivore species richness appears critical for preserving coral reefs, because complementary feeding by diverse herbivores produces positive, but indirect, effects on corals, the foundation species for the ecosystem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available