4.8 Article

Cluster reactivity experiments: Employing mass spectrometry to investigate the molecular level details of catalytic oxidation reactions

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801539105

Keywords

catalysis; tungsten oxide; oxygen radical; carbon monoxide; propylene

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-92ER14258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass spectrometry is the most widely used tool in the study of the properties and reactivity of clusters in the gas phase. in this article, we demonstrate its use in investigating the molecular-level details of oxidation reactions occurring on the surfaces of heterogeneous catalysts via cluster reactivity experiments. Guided ion beam mass spectrometry (GIB-MS) employing a quadrupole-octopole-quadrupole (Q-O-Q) configuration enables mass-selected cluster ions to be reacted with various chemicals, providing insight into the effect of size, stoichiometry, and ionic charge state on the reactivity of catalyst materials. For positively charged tungsten oxide clusters, it is shown that species having the same stoichiometry as the bulk, WO3+, W2O6+, and W3O9+, exhibit enhanced activity and selectivity for the transfer of a single oxygen atom to propylene (C3H6), suggesting the formation of propylene oxide (C3H6O), an important monomer used, for example, in the industrial production of plastics. Furthermore, the same stoichiometric clusters are demonstrated to be active for the oxidation of CO to CO2, a reaction of significance to environmental pollution abatement. The findings reported herein suggest that the enhanced oxidation reactivity of these stoichiometric clusters may be due to the presence of radical oxygen centers (W-O circle) with elongated metal-oxygen bonds. The unique insights gained into bulk-phase oxidation catalysis through the application of mass spectrometry to cluster reactivity experiments are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available