4.8 Article

Alteration of cyclin D1 transcript elongation by a mutated transcription factor up-regulates theoncogenic D1b splice isoform in cancer

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710748105

Keywords

coregulator; Ewing sarcoma; EWS-FL1; polyadenylation; splicing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pre-mRNA splicing and polyadenylation are tightly connected to transcription, and transcriptional stimuli and elongation dynamics can affect mRNA maturation. However, whether this regulatory mechanism has a physio/pathological impact is not known. In cancer, where splice variant expression is often deregulated, many mutated oncogenes are transcriptional regulators. In particular, the Ewing sarcoma (EwSa) oncogene, resulting from a fusion of the EWS and FL11 genes, encodes a well characterized transcription factor. EWS-FLI1 directly stimulates transcription of the CCND1 protooncogene encoding cyclin D1a and a less abundant but more oncogenic splice isoform, D1b. We show that, although both EWS and EWS-FLI1 enhance cyclin D1 gene expression, they regulate the D1b/D1a transcript ratio in an opposite manner. Detailed analyses of RNA polymerase dynamics along the gene and of the effects of an inhibitor of elongation show that EWS-FLI1 favors D1 b isoform expression by decreasing the elongation rate, whereas EWS has opposite effects. As a result, the D1b/D1a ratio is elevated in EwSa cell lines and tumors. The endogenous D1b protein is enriched in nuclei, where the oncogenic activity of cyclin D1 is known to occur, and depleting D1 b in addition to D1 a results in a stronger reduction of EwSa cell growth than depleting D1a only. These data show that elevated expression of a splice isoform in cancer can be due to an alteration of the transcription process by a mutated transcriptional regulator and provide evidence for a physio/pathological impact of the coupling between transcription and mRNA maturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available