4.8 Article

Analysis and synthesis of high-amplitude Cis-elements in the mammalian circadian clock

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802636105

Keywords

comparative genomics; promoter and enhancer database; synthetic biology; systems biology; transcription

Funding

  1. RIKEN Research Collaborations with Industry Program
  2. RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology
  3. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. National Institute of Mental Health and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [P50MH074924-01, 1R01NS054794-01A2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mammalian circadian clocks consist of regulatory loops mediated by Clock/Bmal1-binding elements, DBP/E4BP4 binding elements, and RevErbA/ROR binding elements. As a step toward system-level understanding of the dynamic transcriptional regulation of the oscillator, we constructed and used a mammalian promoter/enhancer database (http://promoter.cdb.riken.jp/) with computational models of the Clock/Bmal1-binding elements, DBP/E4BP4 binding elements, and RevErbA/ROR binding elements to predict new targets of the clock and subsequently validated these targets at the level of the cell and organism. We further demonstrated the predictive nature of these models by generating and testing synthetic regulatory elements that do not occur in nature and showed that these elements produced high-amplitude circadian gene regulation. Biochemical experiments to characterize these synthetic elements revealed the importance of the affinity balance between transactivators and transrepressors in generating high-amplitude circadian transcriptional output. These results highlight the power of comparative genomics approaches for system-level identification and knowledge-based design of dynamic regulatory circuits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available