4.1 Article

Dissolution of Commercially Available Mesalamine Formulations at Various pH Levels

Journal

DRUGS IN R&D
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 211-215

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40268-015-0097-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shire Development LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid; 5-ASA) is recommended first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Many mesalamine formulations employ a pH-dependent release mechanism designed to maximize drug release in the colon. This study compared the in vitro release of 5-ASA from six commercially available mesalamine formulations at pH levels similar to those typically encountered in the human gastrointestinal tract. Methods The release of 5-ASA from six mesalamine formulations [Mesalazin-Kohlpharma (Kohlpharma, Germany), Mesalazin-Eurim (Eurimpharm, Germany), Mesalazina-Faes (Faes Farma, Spain), Mesalazine EC (Actavis B.V., Netherlands), Mesalazine EC 500 PCH (Pharmachemie B.V., Netherlands); multimatrix mesalamine (Shire US Inc., USA)] was monitored separately at three different pH levels [1.0 (2 h), 6.4 (1 h), and 7.2 (8 h)] using United States Pharmacopeia dissolution apparatus II. The dissolution percentage was calculated as a mean of 12 units for each formulation. Results At pH 1.0 and 6.4,< 1 % of 5-ASA release was observed for each of the mesalamine formulations tested. At pH 7.2, complete release of 5-ASA occurred within 1 h for Mesalazine EC and Mesalazine EC 500 PCH, and within 2 h for Mesalazin-Kohlpharma, Mesalazin-Eurim, and Mesalazina-Faes; complete release of 5-ASA from multimatrix mesalamine occurred within 7 h. Little variability in rate of 5-ASA dissolution was observed between tablets of each formulation. Conclusion At pH 7.2, 5-ASA release profiles were variable among the commercially available mesalamine formulations that were tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available