4.3 Article

On the λ ratio range of mixed lubrication

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1350650112461867

Keywords

Mixed lubrication; elastohydrodynamic lubrication; mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication; lambda ratio; film thickness ratio; roughness effect; elastohydrodynamic lubrication simulation; elastohydrodynamic lubrication experiment

Funding

  1. State key laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, China [0301002109159]
  2. Center for surface Engineering and Tribology at Northwestern University, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed lubrication is a mode of fluid lubrication in which both hydrodynamic lubricant film and rough surface asperity contact coexist. Mixed lubrication problems are usually associated with significant surface roughness effect. A common belief is that full-film lubrication occurs when the lambda ratio, defined as average film thickness divided by composite root mean square roughness, is greater than 3.0, while boundary lubrication corresponds to lambda < 0.5-1.0. Mixed lubrication, therefore, is roughly in the range 0.5-1.0 < lambda < 3.0. However, these considerations were established long ago based on early stochastic analyses, which did not adequately consider rough surface asperity interaction and correlation, as well as reduction of asperity heights caused by surface deformation. Recent experimental studies and deterministic numerical simulations suggested that the lambda ratio range of mixed lubrication needs to be re-visited. Actually, when the lambda ratio is greater than 0.6-1.2, little or no asperity contact is found in either experimental results or numerical solutions. If lambda is around 0.05-0.1, there may still be a considerable portion of load, e. g. greater than 10-15%, being supported by lubricant films. It appears that mixed lubrication spans a lambda ratio range roughly from 0.01-0.05 up to 0.6-1.2, according to the numerical simulation results presented in this article. This estimated range is in a reasonably good agreement with experimental observations found in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available