4.7 Article

MicroRNA-26a supports mammalian axon regeneration in vivo by suppressing GSK3 beta expression

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2015.239

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01NS064288, R01NS085176, R01GM111514]
  2. Craig H Neilsen Foundation
  3. Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM111514] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS064288, R01NS085176] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs are emerging to be important epigenetic factors that control axon regeneration. Here, we report that microRNA-26a (miR-26a) is a physiological regulator of mammalian axon regeneration in vivo. We demonstrated that endogenous miR-26a acted to target specifically glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3 beta) in adult mouse sensory neurons in vitro and in vivo. Inhibition of endogenous miR-26a in sensory neurons impaired axon regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the regulatory effect of miR-26a was mediated by increased expression of GSK3 beta because downregulation or pharmacological inhibition of GSK3 beta fully rescued axon regeneration. Our results also suggested that the miR-26a-GSK3 beta pathway regulated axon regeneration at the neuronal soma by controlling gene expression. We provided biochemical and functional evidences that the regeneration-associated transcription factor Smad1 acted downstream of miR-26a and GSK3 beta to control sensory axon regeneration. Our study reveals a novel miR-26a-GSK3 beta-Smad1 signaling pathway in the regulation of mammalian axon regeneration. Moreover, we provide the first evidence that, in addition to inhibition of GSK3 beta kinase activity, maintaining a lower protein level of GSK3 beta in neurons by the microRNA is necessary for efficient axon regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available