4.7 Article

Che-1 modulates the decision between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by its binding to p53

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2015.117

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [MF IG-11356, FM IG-12767, GB IG-14455]
  2. Volkswagenstiftung (Lichtenberg Program HCR)
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO-286, RE2246/2-1, SFB-829]
  4. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft (Preclinical Comprehensive Cancer Center)
  5. Ministry for Science and Technology, NRW (MIWT) [313-005-0910-0102]
  6. Deutsche Jose Carreras Stiftung [DJCLS-R12/26]
  7. Koln Fortune

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tumor suppressor p53 is mainly involved in the transcriptional regulation of a large number of growth-arrest-and apoptosis-related genes. However, a clear understanding of which factor/s influences the choice between these two opposing p53-dependent outcomes remains largely elusive. We have previously described that in response to DNA damage, the RNA polymerase II-binding protein Che-1/AATF transcriptionally activates p53. Here, we show that Che-1 binds directly to p53. This interaction essentially occurs in the first hours of DNA damage, whereas it is lost when cells undergo apoptosis in response to posttranscriptional modifications. Moreover, Che-1 sits in a ternary complex with p53 and the oncosuppressor Brca1. Accordingly, our analysis of genome-wide chromatin occupancy by p53 revealed that p53/Che1 interaction results in preferential transactivation of growth arrest p53 target genes over its pro-apoptotic target genes. Notably, exposure of Che-1(+/-) mice to ionizing radiations resulted in enhanced apoptosis of thymocytes, compared with WT mice. These results confirm Che-1 as an important regulator of p53 activity and suggest Che-1 to be a promising yet attractive drug target for cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available