4.5 Article

A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis

Publisher

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM990

Keywords

fused deposition modelling; numerical simulation; parametric study; part distortion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A finite element analysis (FEA) model was previously developed by the current authors to simulate the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process. The model considered coupled thermal and mechanical phenomena and incorporated an element activation function to mimic the additive nature of FDM. Due to repetitive heating and cooling in the FDM process, residual stresses accumulate in a part during deposition. In this study, an FEA model is used to evaluate the distortions of a part. A parametric study, with three factors and three levels, is performed to evaluate the effects of the deposition parameters on residual stresses and part distortions. Prototype models with larger sizes are fabricated, measured, and compared with the simulations. The simulation results are summarized as follows. First, the scan speed is the most significant factor affecting part distortions, followed by the layer thickness. Second, the road width alone is insignificant. However, the interaction between the road width and the layer thickness is significant as well. Third, there are other two-way and three-way interactions that are of secondary significance. In general, residual stresses in FDM parts increase with the layer thickness. Residual stresses also increase with the road width, but to a lesser extent, although largely affected by the layer thickness. The FDM part distortions from the experiment show a similar trend as concluded in the simulations, but without quantitative correlation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available