4.7 Article

Modeling Cyber-Physical Systems

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 13-28

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2160929

Keywords

Computers and information processing; computer simulation; continuous time systems; discrete time systems; embedded software; modeling; simulation; software; system analysis and design; systems engineering and theory; time factors

Funding

  1. Center for Hybrid and Embedded Software Systems (CHESS), University of California Berkeley
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF] [0720882, 0931843, 1035672]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-07-2-0019]
  4. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (MURI) [FA9550-06-0312]
  5. Multiscale Systems Center (MuSyC)
  6. Semiconductor Research Corporation
  7. Bosch
  8. National Instruments
  9. Thales
  10. Toyota
  11. Focus Center
  12. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1035672] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  14. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0931843] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1035672] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the challenges of modeling cyber-physical systems (CPSs) that arise from the intrinsic heterogeneity, concurrency, and sensitivity to timing of such systems. It uses a portion of an aircraft vehicle management system (VMS), specifically the fuel management subsystem, to illustrate the challenges, and then discusses technologies that at least partially address the challenges. Specific technologies described include hybrid system modeling and simulation, concurrent and heterogeneous models of computation, the use of domain-specific ontologies to enhance modularity, and the joint modeling of functionality and implementation architectures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available