4.6 Article

Non-dimensional groups for similarity analysis of thermoacoustic instabilities

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 5289-5297

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.144

Keywords

Similarity analysis; Pi theorem; Eigenfrequency locus plot; Modal expansion; Quasi-1D Helmholtz equation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An approach for similarity analysis of thermoacoustic combustion instabilities is proposed. A set of non-dimensional Pi-groups is deduced from a solution based on modal expansion of the quasi-1D Helmholtz equation with a time-lagged heat source. Although thermoacoustic stability depends on a considerable number of parameters, which describe the geometry and thermodynamic characteristics of a combustor, the acoustic boundary conditions, the strength of flow-flame-acoustic coupling, etc., it is found that the respective non-dimensional frequencies and growth rates of thermoacoustic modes are dominated by only two H-groups: Firstly, flame potency, which is governed by the intensity of mean and fluctuating rate of heat release and a parameter that quantifies the strength of flame-acoustic interaction for a given mode. The second Pi-group is the non-dimensional time lag of the flame. Eigenfrequency locus plots for three combustor configurations are generated by varying interaction index and time lag of the flame model. It is found that similarity analysis explicates universal features of thermoacoustic instability and helps to classify thermoacoustic modes. Moreover, similarity analysis establishes not only the stability of eigenmodes, but also the sensitivity of eigenfrequency or growth rate to changes of any parameter contained in any of the two Pi groups. In closing, the relevance of flame potency for the design of stable combustors is discussed. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available