4.6 Article

Study of the competing chemical reactions in the initiation and spread of smouldering combustion in peat

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 2547-2553

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.060

Keywords

Heterogeneous combustion; Biomass burning; Oxygen concentration; Oxidation; Pyrolysis

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. International Fire Investigators and Consultants Ltd.
  5. European Union Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [FILE-PIEF-GA-2009-253780]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smouldering combustion of natural fuel layers such as peatlands leads to the largest fires on Earth and posses a possible positive feedback mechanism to climate change. In this paper, we use an experimental methodology to study the smouldering combustion of samples of peat under a wide range burning conditions. Vertical samples (30 mm deep and 125 mm in diameter) are ignited by radiation on the top free surface and the smouldering front propagates downward against a forced flow of oxidizer. By varying the oxygen concentration ([O-2]) and the ignition conditions we investigate the competing pyrolysis and oxidation reactions. A reaction framework with two regimes is consistently observed. The measurements show that a char species is formed by the competing pyrolysis and oxidation reactions in the first regime resulting in net char production and in the second regime char oxidation results in conversion of the char to ash. Lower mass loss rates and the larger residual mass at lower [O-2] suggest that a wider smouldering front is required to sustain combustion as the [O-2] is decreased. These results improve our understanding of smouldering phenomena and the role of the competing chemical reactions. (C) 2012 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available