4.6 Article

Effects of fuel droplet size distribution on soot formation in spray flames formed in a laminar counterflow

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 1561-1568

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.019

Keywords

Spray flame; Laminar counterflow; Soot formation; Laser induced incandescence; Three dimensional numerical simulation

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24760165] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of fuel droplet size distribution of the fuel spray on the soot formation of spray flames, which is stabilized in a laminar counterflow field, were investigated numerically and experimentally. To investigate the effects of droplet size distribution of fuel spray on soot formation, fuel sprays with quasi-mono-dispersed droplet size distribution (QM-DSD) spray and poly-dispersed droplet size distribution (P-DSD) spray were generated using a frequency-tunable vibratory orifice atomizer. The differences in the spray flame structures and soot formation characteristics between QM-DSD and P-DSD were examined in detail using an experiment with two-dimensional laser induced incandescence of soot and using three-dimensional direct numerical simulations (3D-DNS) employing a CIP method. Results showed that the soot formation area in the cases of P-DSD decreased compared to the cases of the QM-DSD under the same Sauter mean diameter (SMD) condition. This tendency was caused by differences of the flame structures. The results of the fuel and oxygen concentration and temperature obtained from the 3D-DNS indicated that the portion of the premixed-like flame structure increased in the case of P-DSD. As a result, the combustion reaction region of the spray flames is enlarged in axis direction in the case of P-DSD in the counterflow field. (C) 2012 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available