4.6 Article

Determination, correlation, and mechanistic interpretation of effects of hydrogen addition on laminar flame speeds of hydrocarbon-air mixtures

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 921-928

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.039

Keywords

Laminar flame speed; Hydrogen addition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50636040, 50821604]
  2. National Basic Research Project [2007CB210006]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001198]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stretch-affected propagation speeds of expanding spherical flames of n-butane-air mixtures with hydrogen addition were measured at atmospheric pressure and subsequently processed through a nonlinear regression analysis to yield the stretch-free laminar flame speeds. Based on a hydrogen addition parameter (R-H) and an effective fuel equivalence ratio (phi(F)), these laminar flame speeds were found to increase almost linearly with R-H, for phi(F) between 0.6 and 1.4 and R-H from 0 to 0.5, with the slope of the variation assuming a minimum around stoichiometry. These experimental results also agree well with computed values using a detailed reaction mechanism. Furthermore, a mechanistic investigation aided by sensitivity analysis identified that kinetic effects through the global activation energy, followed by thermal effects through the adiabatic flame temperature, have the most influence on the increase in the flame speeds and the associated linear variation with R-H due to hydrogen addition. Nonequidiffusion effects due to the high mobility of hydrogen, through the global Lewis number, have the least influence. Further calculations for methane, ethene, and propane as the fuel showed similar behavior, leading to possible generalization of the phenomena and correlation. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available