4.6 Article

Synthesis of tailored WO3 and WOx (2.9 < x < 3) nanoparticles by adjusting the combustion conditions in a H-2/O-2/Ar premixed flame reactor

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 1883-1890

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.162

Keywords

Premixed flame; Tungsten oxide; Nanoparticle synthesis; Particle size and morphology; Stoichiometry tuning

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flame synthesis of WO3 and WOx (2.9 < x < 3) nanoparticles is carried out by adding a dilute concentration of WF6 as precursor in a low-pressure H-2/O-2/Ar premixed flame reactor. The reactor is equipped with molecular-beam sampling and particle mass spectroscopy (PMS) to determine particle composition and sizes as a function of height above burner. Varying the H-2/O-2 ratio allowed us to tune the stoichiometry of the product. With a H-2/O-2 ratio of 0.67 white colored stoichiometric WO3 is formed, whereas the H-2/O-2 ratio >0.8 yields blue colored non-stoichiometric WOx (2.9 < x < 3) nanoparticles. The size of nanoparticles can be controlled by varying the residence time in the high-temperature zone of the reactor as observed by molecular-beam sampling with subsequent analysis using PMS. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of as-synthesized nanoparticles show that particles are non-agglomerated and have an almost spherical morphology. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-synthesized material indicates that the powders exhibit poor crystallinity, however, subsequent thermal annealing of the sample in air changes its structure from amorphous to crystalline phase. It is observed that particles with sub-stoichiometric composition (WOx) show higher conductivity compared to the stoichiometric WO3 sample. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available