4.6 Article

Bayesian framework for probabilistic low cycle fatigue life prediction and uncertainty modeling of aircraft turbine disk alloys

Journal

PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 114-122

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.08.004

Keywords

Fatigue; Life prediction; Uncertainty; Disk; Bayesian inference

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51075061]
  2. National Programs for High Technology Research and Development of China [2007AA04Z403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probabilistic life prediction of aircraft turbine disks requires the modeling of multiple complex random phenomena. Through combining test data with technological knowledge available from theoretical analyses and/or previous experimental data, the Bayesian approach gives a more complete estimate and provides a formal updating approach that leads to better results, save time and cost. The present paper aims to develop a Bayesian framework for probabilistic low cycle fatigue (LCF) life prediction and quantify the uncertainty of material properties, total inputs and model uncertainty resulting from choices of different deterministic models in a LCF regime. Further, based on experimental data of turbine disk material (Ni-base superalloy GH4133) tested at various temperatures, the capabilities of the proposed Bayesian framework were verified using four fatigue models (the viscosity-based model, generalized damage parameter, Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT) and plastic strain energy density (PSED)). By updating the input parameters with new data, this Bayesian framework provides more valuable performance information and uncertainty bounds. The results showed that the predicted distributions of fatigue life agree well with the experimental data. Further it was shown that the viscosity-based model and the SWT model yield more satisfactory probabilistic life prediction results for GH4133 under different temperatures than the generalized damage parameter and PSED ones based on the same available knowledge. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available