4.5 Article

Post-embolization syndrome as an early predictor of overall survival after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

HPB
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1137-1144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12487

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Rural Health VISN 16 Clinical Systems Program Office, Telehealth and Rural Access Program [N16-P00494]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development
  3. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety [CIN13-413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most common treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Post-embolization syndrome (PES) is a common post-TACE complication. The goal of this study was to evaluate PES as an early predictor of the long-term outcome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of HCC patients treated with TACE at a tertiary referral centre was performed (2008-2014). Patients were categorized on the basis of PES, defined as fever with or without abdominal pain within 14 days of TACE. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression was done to examine the association between PES and OS. Results: Among 144 patients, 52 (36.1%) experienced PES. The median follow-up for the cohort was 11.4 months. The median and 3-year OS rates were 16 months and 18% in the PES group versus 25 months and 41% in the non-PES group (log rank, P = 0.027). After multivariate analysis, patients with PES had a significantly increased risk of death [hazard ratio 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.3), P = 0.011]. Conclusions: PES is a common complication after TACE and is associated with a two-fold increased risk of death. Future studies should incorporate PES as a relevant early predictor of OS and examine the biological basis of this association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available