4.7 Article

Forgone vaccination during childhood and adolescence: Findings of a statewide survey of parents

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Pages 202-206

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.019

Keywords

Child health; Adolescent health; Vaccination/statistics and numerical data; Vaccine hesitancy; North Carolina

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Cancer Control Education Program at UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center [R25 CA57726]
  3. NRSA in Primary Medical Care at the University of Minnesota [T32HP22239]
  4. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Widespread immunization confers both individual- and community-level protection against vaccine-preventable diseases. To better understand vaccine hesitancy, we assessed correlates of forgone vaccination for children and adolescents. Method. We analyzed weighted data from the 2010 Child Health Assessment and Monitoring Program survey of North Carolina parents (n = 1,847) of children ages 1-17. Results. Overall, 12% of parents reported having refused or delayed a vaccine for their child. Forgone vaccination was more common for young children than for teenagers (16% versus 8%) and for children born before rather than on/after their due dates (16% versus 10%). Parents with high (versus low) scores on an index of healthy feeding practices were also more likely to report forgone vaccination (17% versus 5%). The most common reason for forgoing vaccines was concern about safety (34%). Other reasons included believing the child did not need (18%) or was too young (13%) for the vaccine, or that the child was sick (10%). Conclusion. Forgoing vaccines is more common among parents who are socially advantaged and highly attentive to their children's health in other areas such as nutrition. Providers should reassure parents of premature or sick children that such circumstances are not typically contraindications to vaccination. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available