4.7 Article

Impact of the UK voluntary sodium reduction targets on the sodium content of processed foods from 2006 to 2011: Analysis of household consumer panel data

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 555-560

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.024

Keywords

Sodium; Legislation; Great Britain; Food industry

Funding

  1. Heart Foundation of New Zealand [1463, 1380]
  2. Australian National Heart Foundation
  3. Stroke Foundation [PH 11S 6015]
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105960389] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MC_U105960389] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. In 2006 the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) introduced voluntary sodium reduction targets for more than 80 categories of processed food. Our aim was to determine the impact of these targets on the sodium content of processed foods in the UK between 2006 and 2011. Method. Household consumer panel data (n > 18,000 households) were used to calculate crude and sales-weighted mean sodium content for 47,337 products in 2006 and 49,714 products in 2011. Two sample t-tests were used to compare means. A secondary analysis was undertaken to explore reformulation efforts and included only products available for sale in both 2006 and 2011. Results. Between 2006 and 2011 there was an overall mean reduction in crude sodium content of UK foods of -26 mg/100 g (p <= 0.001), equivalent to a 7% fall (356 mg/100 g to 330 mg/100 g). The corresponding sales-weighted reduction was -21 mg/100 g (-6%). For products available for sale in both years the corresponding reduction was -23 mg/100 g (p < 0.001) or -7%. Conclusion. The UK FSA voluntary targets delivered a moderate reduction in the mean sodium content of UK processed foods between 2006 and 2011. Whilst encouraging, regular monitoring and review of the UK sodium reduction strategy will be essential to ensure continued progress. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available