4.7 Article

General and abdominal obesity in South Korea, 1998-2007 Gender and socioeconomic differences

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 460-465

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.10.004

Keywords

Abdominal obesity; Overweight; Asia; Body mass index; Education; Income; Occupational group; Socioeconomic factors; Waist circumference

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine national trends in prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in both general (measured by body mass index) and abdominal obesity ( measured by waist circumference) by gender and socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators Methods Data were from four rounds of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys for Korean men and women aged 25-64 (6 286 in 1998 4 839 in 2001 4 181 in 2005 and 2 006 in 2007) We calculated age-adjusted prevalence rates of overweight and abdominal obesity by gender and SEP indicators (education occupational class employment status and income) and examined trends of prevalence and its inequalities Results Overweight and abdominal obesity has significantly increased in Korean men (P for linear trend <001) not in women For men high SEP was associated with overweight and abdominal obesity but the magnitude of socioeconomic differences in obesity measures generally remained unchanged during the study period Among women low SEP was associated with overweight Interestingly increasing inequalities in abdominal obesity according to education and income were found in women Conclusions Clear gender differences were noted in (1) time trends of overweight and abdominal obesity (2) relationships between the obesity measures and various SEP indicators and (3) linear time trends of socioeconomic differentials in obesity (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available