4.7 Article

Constructing a theoretically based set of measures for liver cancer control research studies

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 1-2, Pages 68-73

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.015

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; Theory-based assessment instruments; Cancer prevention; Community-based research

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities [U01 CA 114640]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA109091-01A1]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA114640, P01CA109091] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. measurement tools such as surveys assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors need to be theoretically consistent with interventions. The purpose of this article is to describe the first steps in the process of constructing a theoretically based set of measures that is currently used in three trials to reduce liver cancer disparities. Methods. Guided by a common theoretical formulation-the Health Behavior Framework-we identified constructs relevant for liver cancer control research, compiled items from previous studies and constructed new items, and translated and pilot tested items in collaboration with members of the Vietnamese, Korean, and Hmong communities. Results. We constructed three questionnaires in Vietnamese, Hmong, and Korean languages that are slightly different due to cultural and language nuances but contain a core set of measures assessing identical constructs of the Health Behavior Framework. Initial research demonstrates that items are easily understood and that they are generally related to hepatitis B screening as expected. Conclusions. Researchers are encouraged to follow a similar process for creating theory-based assessment tools. Measuring common theoretical constructs can advance liver cancer control and other health research by facilitating a more systematic comparison of findings across different populations and intervention strategies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available