4.4 Article

Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 575-579

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fetal Medicine Foundation (UK Charity) [1037116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in maternal blood for detection of fetal aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y using targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Methods Prospective study in 242 singleton pregnancies undergoing chorionic villus sampling at 11 to 13weeks. Maternal blood was collected before chorionic villus sampling and sent to Natera (San Carlos, CA, USA). cfDNA was isolated from maternal plasma, and targeted multiplex PCR amplification followed by sequencing of 19488 polymorphic loci covering chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was performed. Sequencing data were analyzed using the NATUS algorithm that determines the copy number and calculates a sample-specific accuracy for each of the five chromosomes tested. Laboratory personnel were blinded to fetal karyotype. Results Results were provided for 229 (94.6%) of the 242 cases. Thirty-two cases were correctly identified as aneuploid, including trisomy 21 [n=25; sensitivity=100% (CI: 86.3100%), specificity=100% (CI: 98.2100%)], trisomy 18 (n=3), trisomy 13 (n=1), Turner syndrome (n=2), and triploidy (n=1), with no false positive or false negative results. Median accuracy was 99.9% (range: 96.0100%). Conclusions cfDNA testing in maternal blood using targeted sequencing of polymorphic loci at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y holds promise for accurate detection of fetal autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and triploidy. (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available